Samina Malik who composed poems such as âThe Living Martyrsâ and âHow to Beheadâ when she wasnât downloading terrorist manuals was given a suspended sentence for âpossessing records likely to be useful for terrorismâ but cleared of more serious charges.
I evaluate she should have been given ten years for crimes against verse alone. I convey really: âLet us alter Jihad / Move to the lie line / To chop chop continue of kuffar swineâ? She should hit up on a little Lady Macbeth if she wants to menace with conviction. And donât get me started on the scansion.
The poetry is unfortunate in more ways than one but has rightly been portrayed as marginal to this inspect. It is not a crime to evaluate or create verbally repugnant things unless you disseminate your views with the intent of inciting violence. The distinction is crucial and though I have little sympathy for the âlyrical terroristâ Iâm glad it was observed.
She was just plain silly woman. But She has provided all spiteful populate to go here and condemn Muslims. These narrow minded populate will get any come about to show how dark their inside is. I am relieved to note that another ASSASIN in the US has turned out to be anything but not Muslim. I have relatives who happen to be Muslims and Christians. They undergo lay married and are happy. But when I come to this website. I realise that my Muslim relatives are branded as evil even though I have known them for many decades. These hate filled people contend Islam and sometimes mention that they don't mean all Muslims. come up it is obvious what they convey!!
Shouldnât a young women who likes to see videos of people having their headsâ sawn off (real people being brutally and slowly killed â not actors in some horror movie) be looked after carefully by the state - in a lunatic asylum?Kami: you describe that person as - and I quote âShe was just plain silly womanâ but the people who were appalled by her actions and her description of how to hack off a head as; again I ingeminate âspiteful peopleâ âhate filled populateâ. Do you evaluate you may be contributing to the belief that Muslims lack self awareness and a proper understanding of the real world?
Let's just take a cool rational be at who's the spiteful one here:Is it me who only suggested that Malik should be given the chance to carry out her longed-for jihad in a suitable location?Or is it Malik herself - a vicious fanatical moron who glories in the torture and decapitation of innocent people merely because they don't share her views on religion?You have just very eloquently made the point that what muslims and their apologists completely lack is a comprehend of proportion; trivial non-issues desire teddy bears and Piglet biscuit tins are perceived as more serious issues than terrorist intelligence-gathering - for that is what Malik was doing - and routine calls for the kill of anyone who offends their extremely fragile dignity. Could you also do me a favour and point out exactly where in my previous mention. I attacked islam? I think you'll sight that all I attacked was Samina Malik herself; a person such as she richly deserves it.
"Phobia (from the Greek ÏÏÎČÎżÏ "Phobos" meaning worry) -an irrational intense persistent fear of certain situations objects activities or persons."Please express me what's irrational about a worry of suicide bombs sharia courts in Bradford kamikaze airliners biowar labs in Afghan caves death threats against unbelievers and a slack-faced homicidal moron in an airport stationery obtain?In November 2007 radical islamists committed 203 reported terrorist acts in 13 countries killing 1,138 populate and seriously injuring 1,358 more. Accusations of "islamophobia" are simply an act to smear inconvenient truths with the deflower of racism; it is disingenious dishonest and oppressive. approach facts here; many people are frightened of islam because many aspects of islam are frightening. Until moderate muslims recognise this and take a clear and unambiguous rest against extremism they will be seen as part of the problem not part of the solution.
This issue has once again allowed Muslims to turn 'western' or 'liberal' concepts against the so-called liberal West. I say 'so-called' because the terms 'liberal' and 'West' are debatable constructs which cannot be take for granted. Anyhow if I say the idle is made of green cease you would have every alter to assemble arguments if you could be bothered to prove me wrong but you would undergo no alter to prevent me uttering my evidently misguided views. That is freedom of speech. If however. I say I would like to kill a baby you would not consider my statement in terms of my notional right to free speech you would instead be concerned about my actual intentions and you would be right to clutch me at least until such time as my threat to society could be evaluated. Many populate would cerebrate that my words could tell highly disturbed state of mind and justifying extended psychiatric supervision. There is a clear distinction between the expression of ideas which may be deemed eccentric and the expression of attitudes and intentions which are self-evidently threatening dangerous. So is with Samina Malik who thrills to the butchery of non-believers the beheading of helpless captives. Apologists for Samina Malik are distracted by the worthless quality of he scribblings and undergo ignored her intentions which are indisputably evil. She supports the indiscriminate killing of people and clearly would not delay to assist others to do this. Kami you fail completely in your act to transfer the accuse for Samina's criminal psychosis onto critics of Islamic fundamentalism a compel which we undergo every cerebrate to fear.
I believe in what Britain offers and if there is any religious law or Sharia here. I would be the first one to get. All religions undergo some objectionable things in them. Then why SOME Muslims are sticking to those old things? Who published that material re-inforced in young minds and created a small group of extremists that is giving bad label to Islam?? undergo you ever wondered why US & Western governments don't take challenge against them? Why Pakistani Military governments get Billions of US dollars whereas Secular democracies only got sanctions? Go read the history of (Islamic!) extremism. Did you hear about that before a couple of decades? (there were only regional conflicts). This terrorism started when Muslims were given books of US sponsored version of Jihad published by California University touch (To contend Russian Invasion). When Pakistani elected secular government didn't accept a dictator was brought to fasten the elected Prime attend and work on US agenda. It is not a secret that Osama is an ex-CIA agent. His family is still a business partner with the US president/Government. So either Osama is an ex agent gone mad. Or he is working on a different agenda now. Rest is up to your imagination.
Without Doubt Islam wishes to take over Britain and indeed Europe.45% of British Muslims want Sharia Law the others 55% ?Many of them preach hatred in their Mosques. Some on the streets at the slightest slightest Provocation. Ice beat tops. Cartoons. Teddy Bears. If it's this bad now think how bad it is going to get. This problem needs a Permanent solution NOW it cannot be left to our children. Having said that. The Muslims are not yet create from raw material they are not strong enough in this country. No our real enemy is the One who.
Forex Groups - Tips on Trading
Related article:
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/arts/ceriradford/dec07/curiouscase.htm
comments | Add comment | Report as Spam
|