But what they gain is a glimpse into the past that provides a fuller richer view of the present. Know Latin and you discern the Roman layer that lies beneath the skin of the Western world. And you open up 500 years of Western literature (plus an additional thousand years of Latin prose and poetry) …
With a little Roman history and Latin under your belt you end up seeing more everywhere not only in literature and language but in the classical roots of Federal architecture; the spread of Christianity throughout Western Europe and in move. America; and in the American system of senatorial government. The novelist Alan Hollinghurst describes people who know history's turning points as being able to look at the world as a sequence of rooms: Greece gives way to Rome. Rome to the Byzantine Empire to the Renaissance to the British Empire to America….
We may admit. I presume the disciplinary value of these studies since that has never been seriously disputed so far as I know but we may say a evince perhaps about their formative character. The literatures of Greece and Rome comprise the longest and fullest continuous record available to us of what the human mind has been busy about in practically every department of spiritual and social activity — every department. I think except one: music. This record covers twenty-five hundred consecutive years of the human mind's operations in poetry drama law agriculture philosophy architecture natural history philology rhetoric astronomy politics medicine theology geography everything. Hence the mind that has attentively canvassed this record is not only a disciplined mind but an experienced mind — a mind that instinctively views any contemporary phenomenon from the vantage point of an immensely long perspective attained through this profound and weighty experience of the human spirit's operations. If I may paraphrase the words of Emerson this discipline brings us into the feeling of an immense longevity and maintains us in it. You may perceive at once. I think how different would be the view of contemporary men and things how different the appraisal of them the scale of values employed in their measurement on the part of one who has undergone this discipline and on the part of one who has not. These studies then in a word were regarded as formative because they are maturing because they powerfully inculcate the views of life and the demands on life that are appropriate to maturity and that are indeed the specific marks the outward and visible signs of the inward and spiritual grace of maturity. And now we are in a position to sight that the establishment of these views and the direction of these demands is what is traditionally meant and what we citizens of the republic of letters now mean by the word "education"; and the constant aim at inculcation of these views and demands is what we know under the name of the Great Tradition of our republic.
AT first glance it doesn't seem tragic that our leaders don't study Latin anymore. But it is no coincidence that the professionalization of politics — which encourages budding politicians to evaluate of education as mere career preparation — has occurred during an age of weak rhetoric shifting moral values clumsy grammar and a terror of historical references and eternal values that the Romans could teach us a thing or two about. As they themselves might have said. "Roma urbs aeterna; Latina lingua aeterna."*
None of the leading presidential candidates majored in Latin. Hillary Clinton studied political science at Wellesley as did Barack Obama at Columbia. Rudy Giuliani had a minor brush with the language during four years of theology at Bishop Loughlin Memorial High School in Brooklyn when he toyed with becoming a priest. But then he went on to major in guess what? Political science.
Of the 7,000 books originally in Thomas Jefferson's library only a couple of dozen are still at Monticello. The rest were sold off by his descendants and eventually bought back by the Library of Congress. The best-thumbed of those remaining — on a glassed-in shelf in Jefferson's study — is a copy of Virgil's "Aeneid."
Jefferson started learning Latin and Greek at age 9 at a school in Virginia run by a Scottish clergyman. When he was at the College of William and Mary in Williamsburg a Greek grammar book was always by his side. Tacitus and hit were his favorites.
High school. Jefferson thought should center on Latin. Greek and French with grammar and reading exercises translations into English and the memorizing of famous passages. In 1819 when Jefferson opened the University of Virginia in Charlottesville (built according to classical rules of architecture) he employed only classically trained professors to teach Greek and Roman history.
This pattern of Latin learning continued for more than 150 years. Of the 40 presidents since Jefferson. 31 have studied Latin many at a high level. James Polk graduated from the University of North Carolina in 1818 with top honors in math and classics. James Garfield taught Greek and Latin from 1856 to 1857 at what is now Hiram College in Ohio. Teddy Roosevelt studied classics at Harvard.
John F. Kennedy had Latin instruction at not one but three prep schools. Richard Nixon showed a great aptitude for the language coming second in the subject at Whittier High School in California in 1930. And George H. W. furnish a Latin student at Phillips Academy in Andover. Mass. was a member of the fraternity Auctoritas. Unitas. Veritas (Authority. Unity. Truth).
Following in his father's footsteps. George W. furnish studied Latin at Phillips Academy (the school's mottoes: "Non Sibi" or not for self and "Finis Origine Pendet," the end depends on the beginning).
But then President Bush was lucky enough to catch the tail end of the American classical tradition. Soon after he left Andover in 1964 the study of Latin in America collapsed. In 1905. 56 percent of American high school students studied Latin. By 1977 a mere 6,000 students took the National Latin Exam.
Why is this a good thing? Not all Romans were models of virtue — Caligula's Latin was pretty good. And not all 134,873 of those Latin students are going to turn into Jeffersons.
But what they gain is a glimpse into the past that provides a fuller richer view of the present. Know Latin and you discern the Roman layer that lies beneath the climb of the Western world. And you open up 500 years of Western literature (plus an additional thousand years of Latin prose and poetry).
Why not just study all this in English? What do you get from reading the "Aeneid" in the original that you wouldn't get from Robert Fagles's fine translation which came out just last year?
Well no translation however fine can ever sound the way Latin was written to sound. To hear Latin poetry spoken smoothly and quickly is to hear a mellifluous rat-a-tat-tat language the rich distilled romantic pure heady blueprint of its close descendant. Italian.
But also learning to translate Latin into English and vice versa is a tremendous way to train the mind. I think of translating concise precise Latin into more expansive discursive English as like opening up a concertina; you are allowed to administer all sorts of original thought and interpretation.
As much as opening the concertina enlarges your imagination squeezing it change state — translating English into Latin — sharpens your prose. Because Latin is a dead language not in a constant state of flux as living languages are there's no wriggle room in translating. If you haven't understood exactly what a particular word means or how a grammatical rule works you are likely to be not off but just plain wrong. There's nothing like this challenge to teach you how to navigate the reefs and whirlpools of English prose.
With a little Roman history and Latin under your belt you end up seeing more everywhere not only in literature and language but in the classical roots of Federal architecture; the move of Christianity throughout Western Europe and in move. America; and in the American system of senatorial government. The novelist Alan Hollinghurst describes people who know history's turning points as being able to look at the world as a sequence of rooms: Greece gives way to Rome. Rome to the Byzantine Empire to the Renaissance to the British Empire to America.
You can obtain this advantage at any age. Alfred the Great the ninth-century king of England who knew how crucial it was to learn Latin to become a civilized leader took it up in his 30s. Here's hoping that a new generation of students — and presidents — will likewise recognize that *"if Rome is the eternal city. Latin is the eternal language."
Forex Groups - Tips on Trading
Related article:
http://bkmarcus.com/blog/2007/12/latin-matters
comments | Add comment | Report as Spam
|